Gaga Flips Bird, Smooches Ben's Poker Face, Shoots Fireworks Out of Bazoombas

she dresses like madonna.she is a wannabe.madonna did it all before

I THINK SHE IS AWESOME!!! HER MUSIC IS THE GREATEST AND UPBEAT!

Anybody who dismisses Gaga as a Madonna knockoff because she dresses like made did 20 years ago would have had to dismiss Madonna because she dressed like Marilyn Monroe.

Enough time has passed for it to be a relevant deconstruction. Let it go... your wrinkles are showing.

http://www.air-shox.com air shox

http://www.cigarettes-home.com Wholesale cigarettes

I'd love to eat her ass.

I think Gaga is a breath of fresh air! With good music!

Btw, I just threw away crappy iexplorer8 in which you have to fish in the poorly accesssible cache for pictures like these. In Opera you just tune the javascript of websites to not mess with your rightclick.

Is her crotch wet?

Who in the heck is Ben? & Where it THAT picture? Thanks in advance.
Nicky

Ben Franklin... you know... on the 100 dollar bill.

Wow, NOT a good picture of her ass. If that's what it looks like now...

Whenever I look at Gaga I just think... been there, done that - and not just by Madonna. Think Kylie, Britney, Xtina and the slew of other female pop femme fetales who depend on dominatrix gear to try & grab attention to their act, no matter how well conceptualized or not it may be.

I just think Gaga is firing in the wrong direction artistically, when she could be so much more. Really - what she needs is a subtext that works and is relevant; at least Madonna had that when she was her age, or even younger. Gaga needs to START MAKING SENSE to people, out of all the nonsense she throws at us.. and quit pretending it's some sort of relevant art. If what she does really matters, the 'art' ought to be speaking volumes for itself. But sadly, it misfires at this early stage in her career.

She may demonstrate some degree of technical prowess at singing, the piano and in the pure theatrical aspect of her performances, all edgy and provocative for the sake of being provocative (with nothing 'really' significant or meaningful to provoke mind you)... but if you were to strip away all the layers, the aesthetic value really amounts to nought. You don't walk away from a performance of hers feeling genuinely touched, in spite of all the extravagance and drama. When compared to Madonna in her upcoming years, you realise there's actually precious little in Gaga's performances - whereas Madonna made an impact and delivered messages that made you think, beneath all the elaborate costumery and stage effects. Gaga's messages though, cannot be generalised to a very wide population, e.g. does she model herself as a gay activist, a made-for-theatre type who happened to get lucky, or is she just another young woman who wants a piece of the fame pie and the chance to bask in a spotlight as self-crowned princess for a while? Any way you look at it, Lady Gaga's product - in the words of Lady Madonna herself - is one that requires a process of refinement, filtering maybe. Please don't give us art for art's sake, but instead art that is personally meaningful to us each.

He he. Just download her Glastonbury concert to see how extravagantly popular this chick has been this year.
Artistically her performances often have their own touch. It's fine, it's fun, it's relevant to the party-mood, that's all I want from an artist like her.

She could leave it, but in the real world, did Gaga not stand up for human rights and gay rights, recently, towards congress? It's a Google-search away.

I like that addressing real problems at home better than going off to Africa, to play Santa in countries that the Chinese deem rich enough to build infrastructure in, in return for business opportunities.
Celebrities building a private school overseas, adopting kids overseas, when there are real 'subtexts' to entertain at home. 45,000 deaths per year to lack of health insurance. Who needs to export charity or the US wars to the world, when at home you have such a crooked record of lacking guidelines and competition just for health care alone.

wow, she has a huge butt

ok seriously, why would be bold enough to wear that outfit unless you trunk was so trained & tight you could bounce a dime off it? she is carrying so much cellulite on her backside that is NOT something you want to showcase - EWWW!!

http://www.shoes54.com - best nike air shoes online

@ in4ya :

It's one thing standing up on a soap box (literally) and creating a scene by barking at the US president over the age-old issue of gay activism, an issue that has been played out and, for want of a better word, "over-exposed" in the US media. However, it is another thing literally getting involved in more serious issues that cater to people's basic human needs altogether. I myself am from Africa and can safely tell you you're talking out of your ass if you see matters purely in terms of 'rich nation/poor nation' (your views are superficial constructions at best). There's a hell of a lot of politics involved, which all signify that a country can be extremely rich in resources (both physical and human), but economically poor on a world scale. Why is that? The huge capitalism monster perhaps? Or the enormous debt America owes the rest of the world for years of plundering and misappropriation on foreign soil?

These are things that Lady Gaga, for all her private school education, cannot receive credit for in so far as any credibility to the example she is setting is concerned. If a celebrity wants to make a difference, one could never dismiss the mindshifting effect on the public that is created through real, hands-on dirty work - building schools (anywhere), ambassadorship in war-torn nations, hell, even adoption, no matter how 'calculated' the act of charity or awareness-raising may seem.

So, in that sense, Lady Gaga has a long way to go if she wishes to be a serious contender in the celeb-turned-philanthropist stakes. Oh, cumulatively speaking though - celebs doing philanthropy could possibly be the biggest paradox the west has to offer (why make a few noises here and there about things that matter when you are throwing money away for nothing - oh wait no - for a living?).. Serious stuff.